|
Consumer Christianity
Part One
By
T. A. McMahon
What do I mean by consumer Christianity? Generally,
it is any attempt to build the kingdom of God or build up the
individual Christian (or attract the potential convert to
Christianity) by means and methods that appeal to the flesh, i.e.,
the deceitful and self-serving heart of man. It had its beginning in
the Garden of Eden when Satan manipulated Eve into disobeying God
while believing she was enriching herself (Gn 3:1-6).
More specifically related to what’s taking place today, consumer
Christianity is an endeavor to help Christian churches grow in size
and become more effective through the application of business
principles, marketing strategies, and management concepts. It
characterizes the most popular venture in Christendom today, which
should seem rather odd, if not disturbing, to anyone who has an
understanding of both “consumerism” and “Christianity.” Why? Because
these terms are antagonistic to one another.
Consumerism in the business sense is a concept based upon customer
satisfaction, which is the key to any successful commercial
enterprise. The product or service must be tailored to the wants and
perceived needs of the customer, or there is no sustainable profit.
The consumer rules, because where there is no customer, there is no
profit and, therefore, no business. God rules in biblical
Christianity. It is His revelation to humanity regarding “all things
that pertain unto life and godliness” (2 Pt 1:3). Simply
put, biblical Christianity encompasses all that is necessary for
man-kind to know and do in order to be reconciled to Him, to please
Him daily, and to live with Him for all eternity. It is not a
business endeavor and, in fact, has no relationship to business or
its associated marketing concepts.
Any attempt to enhance the practice of biblical Christianity by
means of business principles is, at best, adding futile
methodologies to God’s Word. At worst, such an attempt rejects the
sufficiency of the Scriptures in favor of works of the flesh,
quenches the Holy Spirit, and subjects one to the deceptions of, the
service of, and in the end, the bondage of the god of this world. In
any case, it leads to spiritual destruction in the church and has
eternal consequences.
Consumer Christianity is at the heart of the church-growth movement,
and its deadly effect is found among all denominations (as well as
pseudo-Christian cults). Many evangelical churches have committed
themselves wholeheartedly to a marketing approach aimed primarily at
attracting the lost, who are viewed as potential customers. As
unbelievers attend the church and mix with new and long-standing
members, the consumer concept unavoidably spreads to the entire
congregation. This inevitably effects the preaching, music, Sunday
School programs, etc., which in turn produces a biblical shallowness
throughout the congregation.
More often than not, the business approach has been successful in
adding numbers to a church. Tens of thousands of pastors across the
U.S., and thousands more internationally, have been influenced by
high-profile ministries and have put to use their various marketing
methodologies for soul-winning and church growth.
Is that the biblical way to win souls and effect growth in the
church?
To some biblical Christians the answer is an obvious “No!” But to
increasing numbers who also claim to hold to the Bible as their
authoritative and all-sufficient source of God’s truth, “No” has
given way to “Possibly…Perhaps…,” or “Let’s be careful not to throw
the baby out with the bath water!” Well, let’s strain the water to
see if there is indeed a baby to rescue.
Is consumerism supported by the Scriptures? Did God shape His Gospel
to gratify the worldly desires of humanity? Are there some things in
the Bible that should be strategically avoided in order not to put
off “potential” believers? Does God’s Word reflect a concern that
people might take their “business” elsewhere if their felt needs
aren’t being met? Does the Bible tell us to make the truth more
acceptable by feeding it to the lost in diluted or entertaining
forms? And is it really the gospel that saves if it’s altered to
cater to non-Christians? If any believer even remotely thinks so, I
fear that the thinking of the world has grievously influenced his
understanding of the Bible.
Certainly, pastors ought to know better, yet in most cases where
consumerism has infected a church, they have been instrumental in
implementing it. The pastors to whom I am referring here, and am
most concerned about, are those who consider themselves to be
biblical, who sincerely want to see souls saved, and who honestly
want to fulfill their calling and ministry in a way that is pleasing
to God. How could such a shepherd of the sheep be drawn into
consumer Christianity?
The process often develops subtly. Let’s say a pastor loves his
church members and wants them to be happy. He also wants them to
grow spiritually, and he is always looking for ways for new sheep to
be added to his flock. When conflicts arise or growth expectations
are not realized, solutions to such problems are often sought from
others who have been seemingly successful regarding those issues.
The recommended remedies almost always involve some form of
accommodation.
For example, a very common church conflict today is that of
different tastes in music, which is usually resolved by establishing
separate services—one with traditional hymns and one featuring
contemporary songs. As that alteration seems to satisfy most
members, many pastors are encouraged to add more souls to their
church by combining the attraction of contemporary music with
seeker-sensitive (appealing and non-threatening) messages presented
in a convenient and casual Saturday evening service. Innovative
programs are then formulated to sustain the interest of would-be
converts and motivate the rarely active church members, with
particular emphasis on entertaining activities to attract the youth
and keep them coming.
Pastors tell me that they reluctantly glean ideas from the world in
order to compete with the world that they might reach the lost in
order to save them from the world. They’re aware of the irony of
that approach but argue that it’s the only way to avoid preaching to
empty pews. The preaching, by the way, is often shortened and
supplemented by visuals, skits, and music productions.
This is a path that, though seemingly harmless at first, leads to
the broad road of consumer Christianity. Although we empathize with
pastors who feel compelled (some even coerced by church politics) to
go down that thoroughfare, it is paved with biblical compromises and
headed for a spiritual dead end.
This church-growth enterprise is hardly new to Christianity. It is a
chronicle of doing things man’s way rather than God’s way. Fourth
century Emperor Constantine has yet to be equaled in successful
strategies for “growing the church.” He professed to have become a
Christian and induced half of the Roman Empire to do likewise. This
era of compromises made by the Emperor (the self-appointed “Vicar of
Christ”/“Bishop of bishops”) in order to draw in new converts is
characterized by Will Durant in The Story of Civilization as a time
in which “the world converted Christianity.”1 Another
historian writes, “Far from being a source of improvement [over the
persecution the Christians previously suffered], this [political]
alliance was a source of ‘greater danger and temptation’ . . . [I]ndiscriminately
filling the churches [with pagans]…simply washed away the clear
moral landmarks that separated the ‘church’ from the ‘world.’”2
One millennium later, Martin “Luther saw and felt [religious] Rome
utterly abandoned to money, luxury, and kindred evils,” writes Edwin
Booth. “He was stunned and unable to understand it.”3
Nevertheless, he and others did something about it. The clarion call
of the Reformation was “Sola Scriptura!” and, although “Scripture
alone” wasn’t followed entirely, God’s Word and His way were
restored as the authority and rule of life for millions deceived by
the devastating compromise that became the Roman Catholic Church.
Consumer Christianity has never been a one-way affair. It takes both
a deal maker and a deal taker. Tetzel, the sixteenth-century
Dominican monk and the “P.T. Barnum” of the sale of Indulgences, was
a master manipulator. Even so, his job was made all the easier by
“indulging” the self-serving natures of his Catholic customers. Both
rich and poor alike were willing to pay anything to avoid the flames
of Hell and Purgatory.
Protestantism has had its own share of both spiritual rip-off
artists and consumers ripe for the picking. Whereas Tetzel’s “fund
raising” was instrumental in building St. Peter’s in Rome, the
“health and prosperity” evangelists of the twentieth century (many
still going strong today) helped build Trinity Broadcasting Network
into the largest religious television network in the world. By
distorting and turning the biblical doctrine of faith into a power
anyone can use to obtain wealth and healing, these con men and women
have personally amassed fortunes at the expense of the biblically
feeble and illiterate, as well as from those “...whose God is their
belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things”
(Phil 3:19).
During the last fifty years, those most susceptible to the schemes
of religious charlatans were professing Christians who had an
affinity for spiritual experiences rather than sound doctrine. They
were usually found among the Pentecostals and Charismatics. Most
thoughtful, doctrine-conscious Christians seemed to be immune to the
“seed faith” come-ons of an Oral Roberts or the blasphemous “Holy
Spirit” power displays of a Benny Hinn, two leaders among a host of
other “signs and wonders” promoters.
However, spiritual gullibility has found fertile soil—or, more
pointedly, a widening swamp—among those who traditionally have
fostered biblical discernment. Although the seductive methodologies
are slightly different, the basis for an effective spiritual
deception is the same: no Christians, evangelical or otherwise, are
impervious to “…all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and
the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life…” (1 Jn 2:16).
Furthermore, the only safeguard against such deception—the reading
of and obedience to the Word of God in the power of the Holy
Spirit—is being systematically diluted throughout the evangelical
church.
Church history has demonstrated the necessity of adhering to God’s
Word; when that takes place, holiness and fruitfulness follow. When
biblical Christianity is adulterated (by adding the methods of men)
or abandoned altogether, man’s religious distortions prevail,
leading the professing church into spiritual anemia and blindness:
“There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof
are the ways of death” (Prv 14:12). There is also a
correlation between the depth of a church’s reliance upon the
Scriptures and its acceptance of heretical beliefs and practices. As
a church reaches a shallow state with regard to biblical
understanding, the ability of its members to discern false teaching
becomes practically impossible.
Consumer Christianity’s most deadly effect is what it does to the
presentation of the gospel of salvation, the only hope a person has
to be reconciled to God. It is nearly always a subtle sales pitch
featuring all the wonderful things God has for mankind: He loves
them so much and desires to have them spend eternity with Him, and
they are significant and of infinite worth. This then becomes the
reason for Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. That mixture of truths
and self-indulging distortions is followed by a brief “sinner’s
prayer” being repeated by those who were persuaded by the enticing
offer. This method has become so commonplace that it’s difficult for
some Christians to recognize any problem, let alone realize how
misleading it is with regard to a person truly being saved.
How so? Let’s start with someone who is genuinely saved and work
backwards. Everyone who is born again by the Spirit of God has a new
heart, one filled with God’s love, for Him and for others, as well
as for His teachings. He or she is a new creation, and although not
perfect in these things, there resides within that person a heart
that desires to please God rather than self.
One explicit example of this is found in Luke 7:36-50, involving the
woman of sinful reputation who entered the home of Simon the
Pharisee, where Jesus was invited to dine. She washed His feet with
her tears, dried them with her hair, and kissed them repeatedly.
Jesus declared of her that she loved much because she was forgiven
much.
These passages teach how essential conviction of sin is in coming to
Christ. The self-righteous and self-serving Pharisee had little or
no conviction of sin and therefore sought no forgiveness. The woman,
on the other hand, gave no thought to herself or the disdain with
which she was regarded by the dinner guests. Her thankfulness that
Jesus would and did cleanse her of her sins compelled her to die to
self and live for Him.
The gospel according to consumer Christianity, on the other hand,
must make its appeal to self, emphasizing things (both true and
distorted) that meet the felt needs of the lost. This seriously
restricts all but a hint of any biblical doctrines that would bring
about conviction of sin. What’s the problem? Jesus came to save
sinners, not consumers.
In the next [issue], we will further examine how some of today’s
consumer-oriented concepts and methods are taking hold in the
evangelical church while perverting long-established teachings and
practices based on the Word of God.
This article is reprinted, by
permission, from

The Berean Call
PO Box 7019
Bend, OR 97708
phone: 541-382-6210
Web: www.thebereancall.org
|